A partnership is not an entity – it is merely a form of shared ownership of property and an agreement to share certain benefits and obligations.
There are 2 types of partnership:
EXAMPLE – General law partnership
Kristen and James carry on a chocolate retail shop as a partnership where they split the profits 50/50. This is a general law partnership.
EXAMPLE – Income tax partnership
Simon and Justine have a joint interest-bearing investment with the bank. This is not a partnership for general law purposes (as they are not in business) but is technically a partnership for income tax purposes.
A company is specifically excluded from the definition of partnership.
Where taxpayers receive income jointly, this is clearly a partnership for tax purposes.
EXAMPLE – Clear partnership
Bob and Jackie own a rental property in joint names, from which they receive income. It is clear a partnership exists because:
– income is derived from the property; and
– the title deed clearly shows the property is in joint names.
However, whether a general law partnership exists (i.e., the parties are carrying on business together) is more difficult to show, as it is a question of fact. The existence or absence of a partnership agreement is not conclusive evidence of an intention (or a lack of intention) to act as partners. However, a partnership agreement normally provides good evidence that the parties intend to be in partnership (although this may not be enough).
Some of the factors the ATO takes into account in determining whether a general law partnership exists are:
The above factors are all factors that the ATO takes into account, but if one or two are missing it does not mean a partnership does not exist. Other factors may also be important.
WARNING – Partnership between family members
It gets considerably more difficult to prove that a partnership exists in an ordinary family situation, as there is often a lack of formal agreements and there is difficulty in distinguishing between family and business responsibilities.
Often, people say they are going into a “joint venture” together with no real thought as to what they mean. Yet the distinction is very important – if they are in partnership they must share income jointly, whereas in a joint venture the income and deductions are accounted for separately by each of the venture partners.
Importantly, if the parties are not in partnership, they may not be jointly and severally liable for the partnership debts and liabilities (refer below under “Disadvantages of a partnership”).
There is no settled meaning of “joint venture”. A useful starting point is that a joint venture is normally an agreement to share output, rather than income.
EXAMPLE – Joint Venture
ABC Pty Ltd and XYZ Pty Ltd enter into a joint venture for the subdivision, development and sale of 10 units. ABC Pty Ltd and XYZ Pty Ltd are entitled to units 1 to 6 and 7 to 10 respectively.
As ABC Pty Ltd and XYZ Pty Ltd have agreed to share output, this is likely to be a joint venture and not a partnership.
If ABC Pty Ltd and XYZ Pty Ltd instead agreed they would sell the units and split the proceeds, this would be a partnership.
It should be noted that the partners of a partnership do not have to be individuals – they may instead be companies or trusts (or a combination of one or more individuals, companies and/or trusts). Our partnership deed allows for partners that are either individuals or “entity partners” such as trusts or companies.
It is quite common for some (or even all) of the partners of a partnership to be discretionary trusts (or rather, for some or all of the partners to be the trustees of their respective discretionary trusts).
A partnership of discretionary trusts may provide additional advantages as compared to a partnership of individuals, including in particular:
However, operating a partnership of discretionary trusts is complex, and advice should be sought from your accountant in relation to the above possible advantages and other issues.
There are a number of important issues to consider when operating a partnership.
After the partnership agreement has been signed, a partnership bank account should be opened. This will be a joint bank account. Banks will normally provide a list of the things they will require to open up the bank account.
Often, when a partnership starts, the partners inject their own capital into the partnership to get it going.
EXAMPLE – Initial capital
Bill and Ben are starting their flowerpot business and will operate as a partnership. Bill and Ben are each putting in $10,000 to start the business. This money (known as partnership capital) will be used to pay start-up costs.
The partnership agreement (if there is one) should set out how the partnership capital should be treated and accounted for throughout the life of the partnership.
The basis of splitting profits is generally set out in the partnership agreement.
WARNING
Generally speaking, only general law partnerships (i.e., business partnerships) deriving income are able to split profits in different proportions to the partner’s underlying interest in the partnership.
This means that rental property owners and people who jointly invest in shares or interest-bearing deposits (i.e., those in tax law partnerships) must pay tax on their share of the profits or losses based on their underlying ownership interest in the jointly owned asset(s), and cannot agree on another way of splitting the income and expenses for tax purposes.
Even though a partnership is not legally a separate entity, there are a number of taxes that the partnership may have to register for, including GST, PAYG withholding and so on. In this regard, advice should be obtained from your accountant.
The main advantage of a partnership is simplicity. Other advantages are:
Also refer above to the additional advantages for a partnership of discretionary trusts.
The main disadvantages of a partnership are:
When a new partner is admitted to a partnership or a partner retires from a partnership, the current partnership ceases and generally a new partnership is created.
EXAMPLE – Retirement of partner
Josie, Jackie and Jocelyn are all partners in the Music Club Partnership. Josie is retiring, leaving Jackie and Jocelyn to run the business. At the time Josie leaves, the old partnership (of Josie, Jackie and Jocelyn) ceases, and a new partnership (of Jackie and Jocelyn) begins.
The ATO’s requirements regarding a change in partners are set out in the instructions for partnership tax returns, available at www.ato.gov.au (regarding “reconstituted partnerships”). Subject to the below administrative concession, the ATO generally requires the ‘new’ partnership to obtain a new tax file number (‘TFN’) and ABN and the ‘old’ partnership to lodge a tax return for the period from the beginning of the tax year to the date the partnership was reconstituted (i.e., the date the membership of the partnership changed). The new partnership (or possibly a sole trader, if there is only one ‘partner’ remaining) will need to lodge a tax return for the period from the date of the reconstitution to the end of the tax year.
TIP – Administrative concession if there is a “technical dissolution”
If the change in the composition of the partnership amounts only to a “technical dissolution” of the partnership, the partnership may be able to continue as a “reconstituted continuing entity”. In that case, the ATO does not require the new partnership to obtain a new TFN (although application must be made to the ATO for continued use of the partnership’s TFN) or for two tax returns to be lodged in the one year.
Refer to the link below for further information (including as to the meaning of “reconstituted continuing entity” and “technical dissolution”):
Only one tax return need to be lodged for a “reconstituted continuing entity” for the whole year but, when it is lodged, it must contain the following information:
Advice should be sought from your accountant as required in relation to the above.
On the entry and retirement of partners, there are a number of important tax issues including those relating to the following (note that this list is not exhaustive):
A company agent/manager is sometimes used to act on behalf of the partnership (especially where it is a partnership of trusts). This is done predominantly for administrative ease. Although not absolutely necessary, each of the partners would generally have a proportionate number of shares in the company acting as agent and appoint a director to the agent’s board.
The partnership agreement should ensure that the agent can only act under the direction of the partners (and it should in fact only act under such direction). Otherwise, there is a risk that the agent may instead be treated as a trustee of a trust (with the partners being the beneficiaries).
A partnership may make supplies and acquisitions of goods and/or services. This will either be done by the partnership itself or, if it has an agent acting for it, through the agent.
If there is no agent, the partnership should obtain an ABN and, if it is necessary (i.e., its turnover is above the threshold) or it chooses to do so, register for GST.
However, if there is an agent, the question will arise as to who should account for GST and how should it be done.
The GST Act provides two ways that a partnership acting through an agent can account for GST:
This is an artificial option provided by Division 153-B of the GST Act (since this is not how agency transactions are legally treated) and can be more complicated than the next option; or
Option 1
If your partnership chooses to use the first option for accounting for GST, the registration question is quite simple: both the partnership and agent will need to obtain ABNs and register for GST (if necessary), and will each issue (and receive) their own tax invoices. The partnership and agent will be considered to make supplies to and from each other.
Option 2
If your partnership chooses to use the second option, even though the partnership may act through an agent, it is the partnership, and not the agent, that is liable for all GST and which can claim input tax credits. A Goods and Services Tax Ruling issued by the ATO, GSTR 2013/1 (which supersedes previous GST rulings, including GSTR 2000/17, which has been withdrawn), states (at paragraph 95):
“…when an agent uses his or her authority to act for a principal, then any act done on behalf of that principal is an act of the principal. An entity therefore makes a supply or acquisition if their agent makes it on their behalf.”
Therefore, the partnership (as the principal) needs to have an ABN and be registered for GST.
The partnership can issue tax invoices and receive tax invoices in its own name, for GST and input tax credits purposes.
However, if the partnership wants the agent to be, to all intents and purposes, the ‘face’ of the business and able to issue (or receive) tax invoices in its own name, the agent will need to, at the least, obtain an ABN. Under GSTR 2000/37, a principal can rely on tax invoices issued or received by an agent with the agent’s name and ABN. If the agent does not make any supplies or acquisitions in its own name – i.e., it only acts as agent for the partnership and does not do anything else – it will not need to register for GST, subject to one concern.
The concern is that, although any tax invoice issued by that agent (with the agent’s own ABN) should be valid, if someone dealing with the agent receives such a tax invoice and then checks the online ABN register to confirm that the ABN is valid, it will see that the agent is not registered for GST. Therefore, they may think that they are not able to claim an input tax credit (despite the fact that they should be able to, as the taxable supply is actually being made by the partnership (which is registered in this scenario), via the agent).
This problem can be avoided if the agent also registers for GST. However, this does mean that there is the added administrative hassle of the agent needing to lodge business activity statements (BASs). If the agent does not do anything else except act as agent for the partnership, it should have no supplies and no acquisitions and should simply need to lodge nil statements each period (unless the agent is paid for its services as agent or otherwise uses the first option above).
Therefore, in summary:
This is a complex area and we recommend you obtain professional advice if you are at all unsure about operating in this area.
Our partnership agreement is designed for a partnership of both individuals and non-individuals (e.g., trusts and companies). It is therefore a more complex agreement than a ‘standard’ partnership agreement only for individual partners.
The following are some of the features of our Partnership Agreement. However, the agreement should be read in full to fully ascertain the relationship between the partners.
This guide is intended to be a guide only. You should not act solely on the basis of the information contained in this Guide because many aspects of the material have been generalised and the tax laws apply differently to different people in different circumstances. Further, as tax and other laws change frequently, there may have been changes to the law since the Guide was written.
Australian Business Structures Pty Ltd, its directors, employees, consultants and author expressly disclaim any and all liability to any person, whether a purchaser or not, for the consequences of anything done or omitted to be done by any such person relying on a part or the whole of the contents of this publication.
None of the comments in this Guide are intended to be advice, whether legal, professional or financial. Do not act on the information contained in this Guide without first obtaining specific advice regarding your particular circumstances from a tax or legal professional.
© 2021 Australian Business Structures Pty Ltd.
All rights reserved. Except as permitted by the Copyright Act 1968, no part of this Guide may be reproduced or published in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical (including photocopying, recording, or by information storage or retrieval system) without prior written permission from Australian Business Structures Pty Ltd.
The law is as stated 1 January 2018.